<!-- AI-generated report review · from Chapter 19 of The Product 360 Handbook -->

# Report review · [Report title] · [Date]

**Reviewer:** [name]   **Audience:** [who]   **Analysis verified on:** [date, checklist link]

| # | Question | Yes / No | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does the headline answer the question in the brief, in one sentence? | | |
| 2 | Is every number traceable to the verified analysis, with source, window and timestamp? | | |
| 3 | Has any number, quote or claim appeared that isn't in the analysis? | | |
| 4 | Are causal words ("drove", "caused", "because") supported by causal evidence? | | |
| 5 | Are caveats proportional: neither buried nor overwhelming? | | |
| 6 | Is each chart honest: right type for the comparison, one message, bars from zero, units and window labeled, events annotated? | | |
| 7 | Is the decision request explicit, with options and an owner? | | |
| 8 | Have personal data and customer names been removed or approved for this audience? | | |
| 9 | Would the reader reach the same conclusion from the evidence alone? | | |

## Decision record
- Decision:
- Confidence (high / medium / low) and why:
- Threshold that would change it:
- Owner and review date:
- Logged at: [decision log link]
