# Stakeholder map · [Product or initiative] · [Date] **Owner:** [PM] **Scope:** Internal / External **Next review:** [Date, at least quarterly] | Name and role | Team | Power (H/M/L, with reason) | Interest (H/M/L) | Quadrant | Current stance | Desired stance, by when | What they're measured on (their currency) | What they fear | Relationship owner | Last touch | Next action | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Quadrants: Manage closely (high power, high interest) / Keep satisfied (high power, low interest) / Keep informed (low power, high interest) / Monitor (low power, low interest). Stance: Champion / Supporter / Neutral / Skeptic / Blocker. ## Sleeping gatekeepers High-power stakeholders who could block late (security, legal, finance, procurement) and the date each moves to "manage closely": 1. 2. ## Evidence for stance For each stance rating, link what the person actually said or did, with dates. Refresh from evidence, not memory.